Ethereum: Can the `totalSupply` of a token be different than the sum of all account balances?
Could the total amount or token from all accounts balance?
**
The Ethereum Blockchain brand economy is governed by the intellectual agreement 0x0x. One fundamental aspect of this ecosystem is the Tota -Toplas field, which reflects the total number of circulation tokens. But what happens when the total supply and the amount of all accounts vary?
In this article, we will investigate whether it is theoretically possible that the differences in “full sides” are different from all accounts, specifically depending on the reconstruction of the token.
Basics: General Supply and Account Balance
- Outdoor “common” representative of the total number of chips, which can be hero by all Ethereum network accounts.
- Account balance is the instant image of The Blockchain Person or Organization Currently Hero.
** Could the total supply of all accounts balance?
Theoretically, it may be that the “complete” may differ from the amount of all account balances. Here are some scenarios that can lead to the following:
Restoring Access Key : Word with differential representative conditions (eg linear or square) may be adjusted. In this case, the new Totalsuply may be higher than the amount of all account balances.
Changes in the distribution of chips : If the token distribution in all accounts changes over time (eg market fluctuating or new partnerships), Totesuply and all accounts may be higher.
** Is it a security risk?
The possibility of the Totalsuply difference from the amount of all account balances is not fundamentally harmful. However, if the difference causes a significant discrepancy between the distribution of chips or echoes, it may cause:
* False Access Key Management : Inadvertent token transfers due to calculations or improperly aligned representative strategies errors.
* Lack of transparency : The difficulty of understanding how the values of the tokens are released and managed.
To soften the risk
To reduce the potential risks associated with such discrepancies, developers can implement the following measures:
1
2.
3.
Conclusion
The possibility that the “completely poured” difference from the amount of all account balances is theoretical risk, but it is not necessarily a security group. By installing reliable audit mechanisms and errors, developers can reduce the potential impact of such discrepancies on chips and revitalize strategies.